PackAnalyst

Courtyard vs Jupiter Gacha

The same rows, the same units, for every site: measured value first, then the terms that decide what you keep. Nothing here is blended into an overall score, and where a site does not publish a fact we write "N/A" instead of estimating it.

FeatureCourtyard logoCourtyard
Cash
checked 2026-10-04
Visit site
Jupiter Gacha logoJupiter Gacha
Crypto
checked 2026-10-04
Visit site
Measured value
Gross return (measured)?91.8%103.9%best
Typical rip (median)?81.6%best79.7%
Net take-home on its best pack?N/A?N/A?
Pulls sampled?231,989351,589best
Packs tracked144best94
Getting paid
WithdrawYesN/A?
Paid out as?cashcrypto
Payout speedN/A?N/A?
Buyback rate?N/A?N/A?
Withdrawal feeN/A?N/A?
Getting started
Payment methodsN/A?N/A?
Crypto wallet neededN/A?Yes
Minimum buy-inN/A?N/A?
ID checkRequired before shippingN/A?
Where you can buyWorldwide, excl. embargoed jurisdictionsN/A?
Getting your card
Ships the cardYesN/A?
Ships toWorldwideN/A?
Shipping costYou pay shipping and taxesN/A?
Vault costFreeN/A?

"Best" marks the highest value in that row only, and only where the row is numerically comparable. It is not an overall verdict: a site can lead on return and trail on payout terms. Returns are gross unless the row says otherwise.

Which of these is right for you

Courtyard

Measured 91.8% gross with a typical rip of 81.6%. No buyback rate published. Best suited if you want plain cash out.

Full Courtyard review →

Jupiter Gacha

Measured 103.9% gross with a typical rip of 79.7%. No buyback rate published. Best suited if you want crypto settlement.

Full Jupiter Gacha review →

Other comparisons