PackAnalyst

Arena Club vs Jupiter Gacha

The same rows, the same units, for every site: measured value first, then the terms that decide what you keep. Nothing here is blended into an overall score, and where a site does not publish a fact we write "N/A" instead of estimating it.

FeatureArena Club logoArena Club
Not stated
checked 2026-10-04
Visit site
Jupiter Gacha logoJupiter Gacha
Crypto
checked 2026-10-04
Visit site
Measured value
Gross return (measured)?–103.9%best
Typical rip (median)?–79.7%best
Net take-home on its best pack?N/A?N/A?
Pulls sampled?0351,589best
Packs tracked4694best
Getting paid
WithdrawN/A?N/A?
Paid out as?N/A?crypto
Payout speedN/A?N/A?
Buyback rate?N/A?N/A?
Withdrawal feeN/A?N/A?
Getting started
Payment methodsN/A?N/A?
Crypto wallet neededN/A?Yes
Minimum buy-inN/A?N/A?
ID checkN/A?N/A?
Where you can buyN/A?N/A?
Getting your card
Ships the cardYesN/A?
Ships toN/A?N/A?
Shipping costN/A?N/A?
Vault costN/A?N/A?

"Best" marks the highest value in that row only, and only where the row is numerically comparable. It is not an overall verdict: a site can lead on return and trail on payout terms. Returns are gross unless the row says otherwise.

Which of these is right for you

Arena Club

Measured – gross with a typical rip of –. No buyback rate published. Best suited if you want to spend winnings on site.

Full Arena Club review →

Jupiter Gacha

Measured 103.9% gross with a typical rip of 79.7%. No buyback rate published. Best suited if you want crypto settlement.

Full Jupiter Gacha review →

Other comparisons