PackAnalyst

Magic Eden vs Monster

The same rows, the same units, for every site: measured value first, then the terms that decide what you keep. Nothing here is blended into an overall score, and where a site does not publish a fact we write "N/A" instead of estimating it.

FeatureMagic Eden logoMagic Eden
Crypto
checked 2026-10-04
Visit site
Monster logoMonster
Not stated
checked 2026-10-04
Visit site
Measured value
Gross return (measured)?111.9%best104.2%
Typical rip (median)?83.7%best79.8%
Net take-home on its best pack?N/A?N/A?
Pulls sampled?61628,580best
Packs tracked46best
Getting paid
WithdrawN/A?Yes
Paid out as?cryptoN/A?
Payout speedN/A?N/A?
Buyback rate?N/A?N/A?
Withdrawal feeN/A?N/A?
Getting started
Payment methodsN/A?N/A?
Crypto wallet neededYesN/A?
Minimum buy-in25N/A?
ID checkN/A?N/A?
Where you can buyN/A?N/A?
Getting your card
Ships the cardYesYes
Ships toN/A?N/A?
Shipping costN/A?N/A?
Vault costN/A?N/A?

"Best" marks the highest value in that row only, and only where the row is numerically comparable. It is not an overall verdict: a site can lead on return and trail on payout terms. Returns are gross unless the row says otherwise.

Which of these is right for you

Magic Eden

Measured 111.9% gross with a typical rip of 83.7%. No buyback rate published. Best suited if you want crypto settlement.

Full Magic Eden review →

Monster

Measured 104.2% gross with a typical rip of 79.8%. No buyback rate published. Best suited if you want to spend winnings on site.

Full Monster review →

Other comparisons