PackAnalyst

Packz vs Vaultr

The same rows, the same units, for every site: measured value first, then the terms that decide what you keep. Nothing here is blended into an overall score, and where a site does not publish a fact we write "N/A" instead of estimating it.

FeaturePackz logoPackz
Not stated
checked 2026-10-04
Visit site
Vaultr logoVaultr
Not stated
checked 2026-10-04
Visit site
Measured value
Gross return (measured)?–99.0%best
Typical rip (median)?–84.9%best
Net take-home on its best pack?N/A?78.6%best
Pulls sampled?026,057best
Packs tracked20best8
Getting paid
WithdrawN/A?N/A?
Paid out as?N/A?N/A?
Payout speedN/A?N/A?
Buyback rate?N/A?~90%best
Withdrawal feeN/A?N/A?
Getting started
Payment methodsN/A?N/A?
Crypto wallet neededN/A?N/A?
Minimum buy-inN/A?N/A?
ID checkN/A?N/A?
Where you can buyN/A?N/A?
Getting your card
Ships the cardYesYes
Ships toN/A?N/A?
Shipping costN/A?N/A?
Vault costN/A?N/A?

"Best" marks the highest value in that row only, and only where the row is numerically comparable. It is not an overall verdict: a site can lead on return and trail on payout terms. Returns are gross unless the row says otherwise.

Which of these is right for you

Packz

Measured – gross with a typical rip of –. No buyback rate published. Best suited if you want to spend winnings on site.

Full Packz review →

Vaultr

Measured 99.0% gross with a typical rip of 84.9%. Sell-back at about 90%, settled in null. Best suited if you want to spend winnings on site.

Full Vaultr review →

Other comparisons