PackAnalyst

Monster vs RipRip

The same rows, the same units, for every site: measured value first, then the terms that decide what you keep. Nothing here is blended into an overall score, and where a site does not publish a fact we write "N/A" instead of estimating it.

FeatureMonster logoMonster
Not stated
checked 2026-10-04
Visit site
RipRip logoRipRip
Cash
checked 2026-10-04
Visit site
Measured value
Gross return (measured)?104.2%best101.3%
Typical rip (median)?79.8%83.3%best
Net take-home on its best pack?N/A?79.1%best
Pulls sampled?28,580best20,765
Packs tracked67best
Getting paid
WithdrawYesYes
Paid out as?N/A?cash
Payout speedN/A?Instant
Buyback rate?N/A?~90%best
Withdrawal feeN/A?N/A?
Getting started
Payment methodsN/A?Card, Google Pay, Apple Pay, crypto
Crypto wallet neededN/A?No
Minimum buy-inN/A?N/A?
ID checkN/A?None to sign up; ID needed only for fiat cash-out via Coinflow, crypto cash-out without
Where you can buyN/A?Worldwide
Getting your card
Ships the cardYesYes
Ships toN/A?Worldwide
Shipping costN/A?Depends on your address
Vault costN/A?N/A?

"Best" marks the highest value in that row only, and only where the row is numerically comparable. It is not an overall verdict: a site can lead on return and trail on payout terms. Returns are gross unless the row says otherwise.

Which of these is right for you

Monster

Measured 104.2% gross with a typical rip of 79.8%. No buyback rate published. Best suited if you want to spend winnings on site.

Full Monster review →

RipRip

Measured 101.3% gross with a typical rip of 83.3%. Sell-back at about 90%, settled in cash. Best suited if you want plain cash out.

Full RipRip review →

Other comparisons